<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Einstein &amp; Cell Phones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bearcastle.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearcastle.com/blog/?p=2165</link>
	<description>Cerebral Spectroscopy / Nullus pudor est ad meliora transire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:26:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://bearcastle.com/blog/?p=2165&#038;cpage=1#comment-21339</link>
		<dc:creator>S.W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearcastle.com/blog/?p=2165#comment-21339</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m obviously not a distinguished expert in this. Nor am I a heavy and enthusiastic cell phone user. I do maintain a reasonable, somewhat skeptical curiosity.

One question that comes to mind concerns timing and circumstance. A recent New York Times article pointed out how cancers occur with alarming frequency in humans, but most of the time they&#039;re taken care of by the body&#039;s own defenses: antibodies. Could it be that for some subtle, as yet not understood reason, exposure to micowave energy just at the time antibodies set upon a neoplasm inhibits the antibodies&#039; ability to stop neoplastic growth?  Could the walls/coatings of either cell type undergo an unhelpful change because of microwave energy? 

That&#039;s just one question. There are surely others. Then answer, I think, will first be arrived at through statistical data on cell phone users over time. But laboratory studies seem to be in order at some point.

So in a larger sense, what I&#039;m asking is, do we know with perfect certainty that only ionizing radiation plays a role in cancer? I&#039;m not so sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m obviously not a distinguished expert in this. Nor am I a heavy and enthusiastic cell phone user. I do maintain a reasonable, somewhat skeptical curiosity.</p>
<p>One question that comes to mind concerns timing and circumstance. A recent New York Times article pointed out how cancers occur with alarming frequency in humans, but most of the time they&#039;re taken care of by the body&#039;s own defenses: antibodies. Could it be that for some subtle, as yet not understood reason, exposure to micowave energy just at the time antibodies set upon a neoplasm inhibits the antibodies&#039; ability to stop neoplastic growth?  Could the walls/coatings of either cell type undergo an unhelpful change because of microwave energy? </p>
<p>That&#039;s just one question. There are surely others. Then answer, I think, will first be arrived at through statistical data on cell phone users over time. But laboratory studies seem to be in order at some point.</p>
<p>So in a larger sense, what I&#039;m asking is, do we know with perfect certainty that only ionizing radiation plays a role in cancer? I&#039;m not so sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
